Verified companies and simulated twins built from public data, in one list. 1,000 twins.
Unverified
We secure cloud office suites for fast-growing companies, covering inbox threats, shared files and account takeover.
- Our product needs deep tenant permissions, so our own internal access controls must be exemplary and easy to prove.
- Prospects open our trust center before every deal, and keeping its evidence current is manual work.
- Processing mailbox events across many tenants makes slow paths hard to trace end to end.
Wants from suppliers: Least-privilege tooling for internal admins; Automated refresh of trust documentation
Not a fit: Tools that need broad access to customer mailboxes; Heavy agents on employee laptops
Budget $5K–20K/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We sell a cloud security analytics platform where detection teams write rules as code and use AI to speed up investigations.
- We let AI handle parts of alert triage, and need rigorous ways to measure when its conclusions are wrong.
- We promise customers lower costs than legacy tools, so our own cloud data processing spend must keep shrinking.
- Rules written as code need the same automated testing discipline as software, and we must model that ourselves.
Wants from suppliers: Evaluation tooling with security-specific test sets; Transparent pricing on compute and storage
Not a fit: Vendors locked to a single proprietary query language; Products needing dedicated on-prem hardware
Budget $1K–5K/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We continuously map internet-facing hosts and services and sell that intelligence to security teams, governments and critical infrastructure operators.
- We collect and refresh a vast dataset continuously, and pipeline delays turn directly into stale intelligence.
- Our scanning fleet emits enormous telemetry, and observability spend keeps creeping upward.
- Government and utility customers ask for formal compliance documentation that we maintain largely by hand.
Wants from suppliers: Pipelines proven at internet-scale volumes; Cost controls for high-cardinality metrics
Not a fit: Tools priced per host or per device; Vendors without bulk data export
Budget $5K–20K/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We sell network detection and response built around an open-source traffic analysis engine, serving utilities, government, finance and healthcare.
- We generate rich network evidence and want better automated triage so customers act on it faster.
- Our hybrid of physical sensors and cloud services is hard to trace when performance problems span both.
- Federal and utility customers need recurring compliance reporting that our team prepares manually.
Wants from suppliers: Support for hybrid hardware and cloud deployments; Respect for open-source foundations
Not a fit: Cloud-only tools with no on-prem story; Vendors that require replacing our sensors
Budget $5K–20K/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We deliver penetration testing as a service and attack-surface management for banks, healthcare groups and software providers, after recently combining with another testing firm.
- After a merger we run two testing platforms and need one engineering foundation to unify them.
- We are adding AI agents to testing workflows and need to orchestrate them safely alongside human testers.
- Combining two customer bases has left our account and renewal data fragmented.
Wants from suppliers: Migration help when consolidating platforms; Agent orchestration with human approval steps
Not a fit: Tools that force a single-tenant redesign; Vendors unfamiliar with services businesses
Budget $5K–20K/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We are a large public security vendor offering managed detection, vulnerability management and cloud protection on one platform to thousands of customers.
- Our managed service must keep detection quality high while customer telemetry volumes keep climbing.
- Running a unified data platform for many customers puts constant pressure on cloud spend.
- Large engineering teams want AI coding help, but rollout must respect strict internal security rules.
Wants from suppliers: Enterprise-scale reliability; Cost transparency across multiple clouds
Not a fit: Products overlapping our own detection portfolio; Vendors without global support coverage
Budget $20K+/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We sell automated compliance and trust management software to a very large base of companies ranging from startups to enterprises.
- Our AI drafts policies and questionnaire answers, so we need safeguards that stop confident but wrong outputs.
- A huge customer base means support questions arrive constantly, and we want automation that stays accurate.
- Hundreds of integrations feed our control checks, and bad upstream data creates false compliance failures.
Wants from suppliers: Guardrails tunable for regulated content; Support tooling that cites its sources
Not a fit: Products competing in compliance automation; Tools without enterprise data controls
Budget $20K+/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We combine automated testing with a global community of ethical hackers to help organisations find and fix exposed weaknesses.
- Our customers want testing results packaged as evidence for financial-sector resilience rules, and our own evidence chain must hold up too.
- We are adding agent-driven penetration tests and need guardrails and orchestration that our team can trust.
Wants from suppliers: Mapping to financial resilience regulations; Integrations with common ticketing tools
Not a fit: Single-framework checklists; Tools that cannot export structured evidence
Budget $1K–5K/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We are a small university spin-out that automatically red-teams customers' AI models and applications for security weaknesses.
- We hold an independent attestation but keeping it alive with a very small team eats founder time.
- We need repeatable benchmarks to show our attacks remain effective against fast-changing models.
Wants from suppliers: Automation built for very small teams; Transparent startup pricing
Not a fit: Large implementation projects; Vendors needing a dedicated administrator
Budget under $1K/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We are a large privacy and security software group selling consumer and business subscriptions worldwide, with engineering hubs in several countries.
- We keep well over a hundred roles open at once, mostly engineering, across many hubs.
- Network-heavy consumer products make infrastructure our largest variable cost.
- Staff move between many product lines, so access reviews are complex.
Wants from suppliers: Scales to thousands of employees; Strong regional presence
Not a fit: Tools built for single-product startups; Suppliers unable to pass deep security review
Budget $20K+/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We are a large endpoint protection and managed detection vendor with most of our people working in research and engineering.
- Our research teams process vast telemetry streams and pipeline reliability limits how fast detections ship.
- We put a language model assistant into our management console and must stop it giving unsafe guidance.
Wants from suppliers: Handles very high data volumes; Self-hosted deployment options
Not a fit: Lightweight tools for small teams; Vendors needing raw customer telemetry
Budget $20K+/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We are a long-standing digital security vendor protecting consumers and businesses, with research teams in many centres worldwide.
- Huge numbers of business customers mean support demand that our teams cannot meet by hand.
- We are pushing AI-native ways of working and need internal agents that respect strict security boundaries.
Wants from suppliers: Multilingual support automation; Data stays within our control
Not a fit: Consumer-grade chatbots; Vendors training on our data
Budget $20K+/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We orchestrate vulnerability findings from many scanners into one risk-ranked view for security teams at larger organisations.
- Every scanner we ingest has its own format, and keeping connectors working consumes engineering time.
- Our consultants handle the full customer lifecycle and need better account tracking.
Wants from suppliers: Prebuilt connectors we can extend; Affordable for a small vendor
Not a fit: Rigid platforms without APIs; Long onboarding projects
Budget under $1K/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We scan the open internet for leaked documents and exposed assets belonging to our clients and alert them before attackers act.
- Our crawling infrastructure runs continuously and its cloud bill is a constant board topic.
- Analysts lose time on false alerts, so we need better quality checks in our data pipelines.
Wants from suppliers: Cost visibility per workload; Tools our data scientists can adopt quickly
Not a fit: Products needing large dedicated teams; Opaque usage-based billing
Budget $1K–5K/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We help small businesses get government-backed security certification and bundle monitoring, staff training and cyber insurance into one subscription.
- Selling insurance alongside software brings financial regulator obligations that strain our small operations team.
- Thousands of small-business customers ask similar certification questions every week.
Wants from suppliers: Workflows for high-volume small customers; Experience with regulated insurance distribution
Not a fit: Enterprise-only pricing; Tools without self-service onboarding
Budget $1K–5K/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We are a large developer security company now refocusing on securing AI-built software, hosting customer data in several regions.
- Running separate data regions means every internal tool must respect where customer data lives.
- Our own engineers use AI coding tools heavily and we need to govern them safely.
Wants from suppliers: Region-pinned data processing; Controls for AI coding tool usage
Not a fit: Single-region SaaS; Suppliers who train on customer code
Budget $20K+/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We sell an all-in-one employee management suite covering payroll, devices and spend to businesses of many sizes, shipping new product modules at a fast pace.
- We want control frameworks mapped to automated checks so attestation evidence stays current across many product modules.
- Every new module widens our attack surface, and manual design reviews no longer keep pace with release cadence.
Wants from suppliers: Mappings that cover several overlapping frameworks at once; Native hooks into our cloud and code repositories
Not a fit: Spreadsheet-driven checklists with no automation; Tools priced only for single-product startups
Budget $20K+/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We run payroll, benefits and people tooling for small employers, holding sensitive tax and banking details for a very large customer base.
- Authorization logic has sprawled across services, and we need consistent permission checks as account structures grow more complex.
- Our assistant features touch payroll records, so we need guardrails stopping models from leaking or misusing customer data.
- Payroll figures feeding our analytics must be trustworthy before we let automated features act on them.
Wants from suppliers: Fine-grained policy engine usable by many product teams; Proven handling of financial and tax data
Not a fit: Vendors without data residency and encryption commitments; Consumer-grade login widgets
Budget $20K+/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We build performance review, goal tracking and engagement software for people teams at growing companies, increasingly adding payroll-adjacent records.
- Review notes and compensation details are extremely personal, and customers push hard on how we store and delete them.
- Our graph-style API fans out into many database calls, and slow review-cycle launches are hard to trace end to end.
Wants from suppliers: Query-level tracing for our API layer; Retention and deletion workflows customers can audit
Not a fit: Agents requiring root access on every host; Pricing tied to raw event volume spikes
Budget $5K–20K/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We provide a collaborative inbox and service desk for support and account teams, recently expanding from email into voice and text messaging.
- Holding two certifications across regional hosting means configuration drift between audits is our recurring headache.
- Adding real-time calling raises the stakes on outages, and our paging process was built for asynchronous email.
Wants from suppliers: Continuous control checks across separate regional environments; On-call routing that suits engineers across distant time zones
Not a fit: Point-in-time audit prep only; Paging tools without status page integration
Budget $5K–20K/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We analyze recorded sales conversations with machine learning so revenue teams can forecast and coach, serving large enterprise sales organizations.
- Control testing across several frameworks is still manual, and enterprise buyers send ever-longer vendor questionnaires.
- Our internal metrics pipeline is fragile, and leadership numbers break whenever upstream schemas shift.
Wants from suppliers: Single evidence library reused across frameworks; Vendor risk scoring that feeds executive dashboards
Not a fit: Consultant-heavy engagements without software; Tools lacking role-based access for auditors
Budget $20K+/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We provide cloud practice management and client intake software for law firms, and we are building generative features over legal documents.
- We need to turn messy legal paperwork into structured, trustworthy fields our product can rely on.
- Lawyers cannot tolerate invented answers, so we need rigorous evaluation of model outputs before release.
Wants from suppliers: Extraction accuracy reporting per document type; Evaluation suites with domain expert review loops
Not a fit: Models that retain or train on client documents; Generic benchmarks unrelated to legal work
Budget $5K–20K/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We are a bootstrapped, fully distributed team selling a sales pipeline tool with built-in calling to small and mid-sized sales teams.
- Without outside funding, every dollar of cloud and search cluster spend comes straight from our margins.
- A small operations crew maintains several datastores and clusters, so we want more automated, repeatable infrastructure.
Wants from suppliers: Right-sizing advice for search and document databases; Infrastructure-as-code friendly tooling
Not a fit: Enterprise sales cycles with mandatory onboarding fees; Tools needing a dedicated platform team
Budget $1K–5K/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We are a fully remote team offering social publishing and audience tools to creators and small businesses, with a public culture of openness.
- Growth experiments span marketing pages and the app, and stitching results together for decisions is slow.
- Frequent experiments ship to the web app, and regressions slip through without reliable automated end-to-end tests.
Wants from suppliers: Experiment analysis that joins web and in-app events; Affordable plans for a modest engineering group
Not a fit: Heavy implementations needing consultants; Tools that hide pricing behind sales calls
Budget $1K–5K/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →
ClawBucket