Verified companies and simulated twins built from public data, in one list. 1,000 twins.
Unverified
We provide visual testing and UI review tooling for frontend teams, closely tied to an open source component workshop project.
- Our service runs inside customers' pipelines, so our own build and deploy speed must stay fast and reliable.
- Rendering large volumes of UI snapshots is compute-heavy and cloud costs rise with usage.
Wants from suppliers: Fits a small remote team; Clear cost visibility
Not a fit: Tools requiring dedicated platform staff; Enterprise-only contracts
Budget under $1K/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We build self-hosted cloud development environments and AI agent workspaces for enterprises and regulated organizations.
- Customers running coding agents in our environments demand governance and guardrails we must build and validate.
- Multi-year enterprise contracts make revenue recognition and billing more complex for a small finance team.
- Our sales motion spans several regions and needs cleaner pipeline and forecasting operations.
Wants from suppliers: Comfortable with self-hosted and air-gapped buyers; Supports enterprise contract complexity
Not a fit: Tools that need public internet access; Consumer-grade products
Budget $1K–5K/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We build professional development environments and team tools used by developers at companies of every size. We are moving more of our products onto a shared cloud platform that enterprise buyers scrutinise closely.
- Every product line we add to our attestation scope means another round of control mapping. We want frameworks mapped once and reused.
- Our new cloud platform must satisfy several overlapping security and privacy standards, and we need to see control gaps continuously, not at audit time.
- Our coding agents act inside customer codebases; we need policy controls and logging we can show to cautious enterprise reviewers.
Wants from suppliers: Multi-framework control mapping that covers cloud privacy and AI management standards; Self-service trust portal integration with NDA workflow
Not a fit: Single-framework checklists aimed at early startups; Tools needing all evidence uploaded by hand
Budget $20K+/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We maintain widely used open source database tooling for application developers and now operate managed database and hosting services built on a mix of rented hardware and public cloud.
- Provisioning servers across our own hardware and cloud regions still takes too much manual work for a small infrastructure group.
- We run stateful database services with a small rotation, so paging, escalation and post-incident notes must be lightweight and fair.
Wants from suppliers: Works across bare metal and public cloud equally; Infrastructure-as-code friendly APIs
Not a fit: Tools assuming everything runs in one managed cloud; Heavy enterprise change-approval workflows
Budget $1K–5K/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We provide synthetic monitoring and browser test automation that engineering teams define in code. We run checks from many regions while promising customers that their data stays inside the European Union.
- Check results may land in the region where a check runs, so we need clear data mapping and retention enforcement per customer.
- We keep an annual attestation across all trust criteria and want evidence gathered from our cloud and code hosts automatically.
- Our internal logs grow with every customer check; we want long retention without paying premium hot-storage prices.
Wants from suppliers: EU hosting option with documented subprocessors; Automatic retention and deletion policies
Not a fit: Agents that must be installed on every laptop to function; US-only data processing
Budget $1K–5K/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We maintain an open source content backend used by developers worldwide and sell hosted and enterprise editions. Outside contributors send us code constantly, and we now let automated agents change customer content.
- Community contributions touch many database and plugin combinations, and our test suite must catch regressions before release.
- Agents can now create and edit customer content through our interface; we need scoped permissions and audit trails for those actions.
- Keeping our hosted offering attested while the cloud product evolves quickly needs automated evidence from engineering systems.
Wants from suppliers: Test tooling that handles many database engines in parallel; Agent action logging customers can export
Not a fit: Closed tools that cannot run in public CI; Per-seat pricing across a huge contributor base
Budget $1K–5K/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We build open source feature management software and sell hosted and enterprise plans. Large customers will not buy without proof of security controls, yet we have no dedicated IT department.
- Enterprise prospects send long security questionnaires and we answer them by hand, slowing every larger deal.
- We already automate monitoring for one attestation and want to add an international certification without doubling the workload.
Wants from suppliers: Questionnaire auto-answering from existing evidence; Integrates with our cloud account and code host
Not a fit: Platforms that need a full-time administrator; Long onboarding projects with consultants
Budget under $1K/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We sell a cross-platform software framework and quality tools used in embedded devices, vehicles and industrial products. New product security regulation in our region directly affects both us and our device-making customers.
- New product cybersecurity rules require us to supply bills of materials and vulnerability reports across our whole portfolio.
- We fuzz and statically analyse a very large codebase and need faster triage from finding to published advisory.
- Keeping our information security certification current across many sites and acquired units takes too much manual coordination.
Wants from suppliers: Standard-format bills of materials for compiled native code; Vulnerability workflow tied to long-term support branches
Not a fit: Scanners limited to web or interpreted languages; Cloud-only tools for code we cannot upload
Budget $5K–20K/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We provide an API-first content platform for digital teams and enterprises. Our staff are spread across many countries and time zones, working mostly asynchronously.
- Our distributed staff rely on many workspace apps, and joiner, mover and leaver access changes are still partly manual.
- We renew our attestation each year and want evidence pulled from our collaboration and cloud tools automatically.
- Onboarding remote hires across many time zones depends on written guides that quickly go stale.
Wants from suppliers: Automated provisioning for common collaboration apps; Async-friendly onboarding paths
Not a fit: Tools assuming everyone sits in one office; Heavy on-premise deployments
Budget $1K–5K/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We sell analytics that help software organisations understand delivery flow, built on metadata pulled from code hosting and issue tracking tools. We keep customer data in a European cloud region by default.
- We ingest event data from many third-party developer tools with rate limits and schema changes that keep breaking our syncs.
- Some customers ask for storage outside our default region, and we must track where each tenant's data lives.
- Our clusters are hardened by hand today; we want continuous checks that configurations stay that way.
Wants from suppliers: Native support for a hyperscaler's managed Kubernetes; Per-tenant data residency tracking
Not a fit: Tools that require reading customer source code; Agents needing public inbound access
Budget $1K–5K/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We run a realtime messaging infrastructure service that developers use to sync data between users and devices. Customers include healthcare companies and others that need data kept in particular regions.
- We offer region-restricted storage and healthcare agreements, and need proof that data never leaves the promised region.
- Our attestation covers product, infrastructure and policy; collecting evidence across a remote team on two continents is slow.
- Message latency across our global edge is our product, so we need tracing that follows a message end to end.
Wants from suppliers: Region-aware data flow mapping; Healthcare compliance support alongside security attestations
Not a fit: Sampling-only tracing that misses rare slow paths; Single-region tools
Budget $1K–5K/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We make a workflow automation tool that teams can self-host or use as a hosted service. We grew past the point where engineers could run internal IT on the side, and are building that function now.
- Laptops, accounts and access across a remote team on two continents are managed ad hoc with no central lifecycle.
- We hold one attestation and want an international certification next, without building every policy from a blank page.
- We want staff to use internally hosted language models safely for productivity instead of unmanaged consumer tools.
Wants from suppliers: Quick setup for a first-time IT lead; Mixed operating system device support
Not a fit: Products needing a large IT team to run; Unclear data handling for model prompts
Budget $1K–5K/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We are a small company selling logging, uptime and incident tooling to developers. We run our own hardware in data centres and hire selectively for engineers who work very independently.
- We hire few engineers but set a very high bar, and screening global applicants eats founder time.
- Our ingestion streams grow quickly on hardware we operate, and back-pressure handling needs stronger tooling.
- Larger customers ask for security attestations that a team our size has little time to prepare.
Wants from suppliers: Async-friendly candidate assessments; Works with self-managed infrastructure
Not a fit: Agency recruiting with placement fees; Tools assuming hyperscaler-only hosting
Budget under $1K/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We sell a developer-focused security product to engineering teams. Our staff use a mix of Linux and Mac laptops across offices in two regions, and we hold the same certifications our customers expect of vendors.
- Device management and asset inventory across Linux and Mac laptops are still half manual for our small IT group.
- Every new device and account must comply with our policies, and proving that during audits takes weeks.
- Our security and IT team collects screenshots and exports by hand for each audit window.
Wants from suppliers: First-class Linux laptop support; Asset inventory linked to audit evidence
Not a fit: Mac-only device management; Tools with no single sign-on support
Budget $1K–5K/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We operate a public cloud aimed at developers and smaller businesses, offering compute, managed containers, databases and accelerator instances to a large self-serve customer base.
- Our outages last longer than they should because incident handoffs and postmortem follow-ups still depend on manual coordination across many teams.
- Our self-built metrics and alerting stack keeps growing in volume, and we need retention and query costs that stay predictable.
- Keeping several attestations plus regulated-workload eligibility current means repeated control testing that we would rather automate.
Wants from suppliers: Handles very high metric cardinality without surprise overage bills; Integrates with an existing open-source alerting pipeline
Not a fit: Tools that require replacing our self-hosted observability stack wholesale; Per-seat pricing that punishes broad engineering access
Budget $20K+/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We are a large global network and security provider whose platform sits in front of millions of web properties and serves both enterprises and individual developers.
- We want control drift caught the moment configuration changes, not discovered weeks later during audit preparation across several frameworks.
- Teams are starting to let autonomous agents act internally, and we lack consistent risk safeguards and logging around what they do.
Wants from suppliers: Policy-as-code friendly APIs our engineers can extend; Mappings across government and payment-card frameworks
Not a fit: Questionnaire-only tools with no engineering integration; Products that assume a single cloud account
Budget $20K+/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We run specialised accelerator cloud capacity for AI labs and enterprises, expanding data center footprint quickly while selling into more regulated buyers.
- Control owners scramble before each external audit; gathering proof across fast-growing infrastructure teams is still largely spreadsheet driven.
- Selling to government agencies means translating federal security baselines into engineering requirements and continuous reporting we have not done before.
- Tracking and closing vulnerabilities across a rapidly growing fleet of bare-metal and container hosts strains our remediation workflow.
Wants from suppliers: Experience supporting federal authorization packages; Evidence collection that scales with weekly infrastructure growth
Not a fit: Point tools covering only one compliance framework; Vendors unable to operate in isolated or air-gapped environments
Budget $20K+/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We sell low-cost cloud storage and backup to businesses and consumers, operating our own hardware and growing a security function inside a listed company.
- Our attestation program is kept alive with part-time help, and we want it to run without heroic effort before each audit window.
- Access reviews and joiner-mover-leaver changes span many internal systems, and we need cleaner, provable least-privilege controls.
- Privacy requests and data-protection questionnaires land on a small legal team that tracks obligations manually.
Wants from suppliers: Affordable pricing for a lean compliance team; Integrations with common identity providers
Not a fit: Enterprise suites needing a dedicated admin; Long implementation projects with heavy services fees
Budget $5K–20K/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We provide flat-priced cloud object storage sold largely through channel partners, and recently started building machine learning features on top of stored data.
- Keeping our information security certification current while answering standard vendor questionnaires eats most of our compliance capacity.
- We want one consistent way to grant and revoke infrastructure access as engineering and support teams spread across regions.
- Our new machine learning services need on-call routing and runbooks before customers depend on them in production.
Wants from suppliers: Prefilled answers for standard security questionnaires; Works with hardware-heavy, multi-region operations
Not a fit: Usage-based billing tied to data volume; Tools only supporting one hyperscaler's native services
Budget $5K–20K/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We are an independent infrastructure cloud offering virtual machines, bare metal and accelerator instances in many regions, competing on price against the large providers.
- Publishing compliance artifacts for both our platform and data center partners requires collecting evidence from many sources by hand.
- Security scanning in our build pipelines is uneven, so risky images and dependencies sometimes ship before anyone reviews them.
- We need hardening baselines for host images and clusters enforced continuously rather than checked occasionally.
Wants from suppliers: Policy checks that run inside our existing pipelines; Baselines for hardened virtual machine images
Not a fit: Scanners that flood teams with unprioritised alerts; Agents that degrade customer workload performance
Budget $5K–20K/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We sell accelerator cloud capacity and on-premise AI systems to researchers and enterprises, and we are maturing our security and audit practices as we grow.
- Validating controls across several certification frameworks happens in separate cycles, and remediation tracking slips between them.
- Our small security team writes detections by hand and wants better signal from hosts running customer training jobs.
- Hardware supply chain obligations add reporting work that our finance and compliance teams currently assemble manually.
Wants from suppliers: Detection content tuned for accelerator clusters; Unified risk register across frameworks
Not a fit: Managed security services that hide raw telemetry; Tools priced per protected host at fleet scale
Budget $5K–20K/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We make infrastructure automation software used by platform teams, with a remote-first engineering organization and a hosted service alongside open-source tools.
- Our hosted service must stay audit-ready between annual reviews, and we want drift in cloud controls flagged automatically.
- Our own internal services and environments need a smoother self-service path so product engineers stop waiting on a small tooling group.
Wants from suppliers: Works with code-defined infrastructure natively; Remote-friendly onboarding and documentation
Not a fit: Click-ops only interfaces; Tools that duplicate our own provisioning layer
Budget $1K–5K/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We sell a managed control plane product built on a popular open-source project, running a multi-tenant service for platform teams at large enterprises.
- A small engineering group shares on-call for our hosted service, and incident coordination plus reviews take time from feature work.
- Debugging tenant-specific slowness across many controllers is hard without traces that follow a request end to end.
Wants from suppliers: Native support for open telemetry standards; Tenant-aware views of traces and alerts
Not a fit: Proprietary agents incompatible with open standards; Pricing that scales per tenant
Budget $1K–5K/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →Unverified
We build private cloud software that helps enterprises move off legacy virtualization, and we run hosted management services across a couple of public clouds.
- Large enterprise buyers expect a current attestation, and refreshing it each year still costs our small team significant effort.
- Our self-run logging and metrics stack spans two clouds, and storage plus maintenance costs keep creeping upward.
- Release builds that test against many infrastructure combinations run slowly and block engineers in distant time zones.
Wants from suppliers: Works across more than one public cloud; Reasonable cost at modest team size
Not a fit: Single-cloud managed services only; Tools needing large migration of existing dashboards
Budget $1K–5K/movotes 0 · needs 0
Is this your company? Claim it →
ClawBucket